Germany’s ex-royals need their riches again, however previous ties to Hitler stand in the best way
Get PureVPN
However, together with the fortress and the wealth, Prince Georg has additionally inherited a really public and, at occasions, ugly authorized battle with authorities to reclaim a household fortune confiscated after the autumn of the Nazis. In keeping with Prince Georg, the huge assortment of greater than 10,000 gadgets contains the whole lot from priceless artworks to the opulent heirlooms of German historical past’s strongest and vital household.
“I see it as my obligation,” he tells CNN, in his first ever TV interview on the topic. “I believe my household would totally comply with pursue these claims, whether or not the judges will finally choose in our favor or not.”
Watch now: Germany’s ex-royals need their riches again
After World Conflict II, Germany was divided into west and east, with the communist Soviet Union and the German Democratic Republic taking management of the latter and seizing the property of peculiar residents and ex-royals alike. The overwhelming majority of the then-privately-owned German royal fortune fell on the fallacious aspect of the Iron Curtain. It will take nearly half a century for the Berlin Wall to return down.
This all implies that a posh authorized declare being debated in 2020 hinges, finally, on the actions of 1 man within the 1930s: Prince Georg’s great-grandfather (and the son of Germany’s final Kaiser, Wilhelm II), Crown Prince Wilhelm.
The end result has the potential to shift massive parts of museum collections from public to non-public arms.
“A court docket choice brings with it the hazard of a call in favour of the Home of Hohenzollern and, within the worst-case state of affairs, of the large-scale elimination of objects from the collections of cultural establishments,” a spokesperson for the German Ministry of Tradition advised CNN by electronic mail. “An out-of-court settlement, against this, would possible make it attainable to keep away from prolonged court docket proceedings and would offer a viable basis for cooperation between the Home of Hohenzollern and the affected cultural establishments.”
Requested if Prince Georg’s claims are justified, a spokesperson for the Berlin Senate Division of Tradition advised CNN in an electronic mail, “The political reply is not any. From a authorized perspective, issues can look totally different. That’s the solely purpose for the talks.”
And past the historic treasures at stake, the case finally provides rise to a query German society has lengthy grappled with: how you can choose the sins of your ancestors.
A uncomfortable household photograph
“It’s extremely laborious to have a look at,” Prince Georg says. “These photos are very sturdy. Particularly once you see the swastika on his arm. It all the time makes your breath cease, and also you ask your self, ‘Why is he sporting that?'”

{A photograph} found by historian John Rohl exhibits Germany’s former Crown Prince Wilhelm saluting at an SA rally in October 1933. Credit score: The Related Press of Nice Britain/John Rohl
Prince Georg says his great-grandfather might have been sporting a swastika, however his main motivation was to return the monarchy to energy — and he believed Hitler might make that occur. The Nazi chief might have even entertained the chance. A British newspaper reported in 1932 that he was secretly plotting, upon his election, to tear up the newly-enshrined democratic structure and type a authorities “with the ex-Crown Prince at its head.”
“The Crown Prince was pushed by the thought of getting again monarchy or getting again to the throne,” Prince Georg says of his great-grandfather. “However he was additionally misled by the concept that it could be a greater to appease the Nazis, not less than in the beginning.”
“It is a disempowered former prince. He was not extensively revered. He was a playboy.”
Chris Clark, historian
It quickly grew to become clear that Hitler had no plans handy over energy to anybody. The Day by day Mirror reported the Crown Prince was “dissatisfied at Hitler’s modified angle in direction of the monarchy,” although he continued publicly supporting him nonetheless.
“He thought that it would assist to maintain the (Nazis) in management and lead them (down a distinct path), which could be extra lucky for our nation,” Prince Georg stated. “And judging from now, this was a horrible false impression.”
“He was in a really tough place as a result of…If he had proven extra opposition — which he’s now blamed for not doing — I don’t know whether or not I might be sitting right here,” he says, explaining {that a} distant uncle was despatched to a focus camp for doing simply that.
But, Prince Georg additionally argues that Wilhelm had neither the ability nor the clout to forestall the dictator’s rise.
“By this time, the Crown Prince lacked the political affect to considerably contribute to the rise of the Nazi regime,” stated Prince Georg.
This was the very place taken by Chris Clark, an historian at Cambridge College’s St Catharine’s School, in a 2011 analysis paper commissioned by Prince Georg’s household, the Home of Hohenzollern.
“It is a disempowered former prince,” Clark advised CNN. “He was not extensively revered. He was a playboy… he favored the look of Hitler, he was fairly sympathetic with the Nazi social gathering, however he did not truly turn into a card-carrying Nazi.
“(Crown Prince Wilhelm’s) lack of political expertise, his lack of a strong community and his lack of an official place from which he might wield energy meant that, as a lot as he may need to assist Hitler, his assist wasn’t particularly efficient.”

The previous Crown Prince Wilhelm pictured with Hitler. Credit score: Bundesarchiv, Bild/Georg Pahl
That did not cease the Crown Prince from making an attempt. In a New York newspaper column revealed in 1933, Wilhelm praised Hitler’s “clear-sighted and energetic management” and blamed communists and Jews for Germany’s tattered repute.
In his paper, Clark concluded that though the Crown Prince undoubtedly supported Hitler, his assist wasn’t “substantial.” In different phrases, the Hohenzollerns should be entitled to compensation.
Evolving historic proof
Loads of specialists have disagreed with Clark — hinting on the complexity of this longstanding authorized battle. Now the Australian-British historian says he has modified his thoughts, citing newly-uncovered proof exhibiting that the Crown Prince had extra public affect than initially thought.
“That is what occurs in historical past,” he says. “We discover out new stuff, we alter our thoughts.”
This new proof was unearthed by Stephan Malinowski, a historian on the College of Edinburgh whose analysis has concluded that the Crown Prince considerably contributed to the Nazi regime. Malinowski, who declined to be interviewed for this story, is one in every of 4 historians commissioned by the federal government and Prince Georg’s household to analyze the connection between Wilhelm and the Nazis.
CNN interviewed 5 further historians for this story, 4 of whom now aspect with Malinowski, although most additionally agreed that neither aspect’s case is iron-clad. Amongst them is John Rohl, who stated that the Crown Prince had as soon as bragged “that he had truly transposed 2 million votes to Hitler,” and Stephanie Middendorf, who argues that he helped make the Nazis extra palatable to the upper-class elites he rubbed shoulders with.
However there are others who assist Clark’s unique place — historians like Wolfram Pyta, whose 155-page analysis paper, additionally commissioned by the Home of Hohenzollern, concluded that the Crown Prince “actively rejected the Nazi system.” Or, impartial historian Benjamin Hasselhorn, who advised CNN that the Crown Prince “did present assist [to the Nazis] however not substantial assist.”
The 1994 compensation legislation successfully ensures that the German authorities is not compelled to compensate industrial giants — like Volkswagen and BMW — who supported the Nazis’ rise to energy and relied on compelled labor from focus camps, to construct vehicles throughout WWII. Each corporations have acknowledged their historic duty and paid compensation to victims.
However the legislation’s intent is unclear relating to former royals. Within the 1800s, earlier than Germany was a rustic, the area was comprised of many smaller kingdoms, every with their very own royal, or noble, households. A few of them have already quietly secured restitution for property and land misplaced throughout communist rule in East Germany, like Michael-Benedikt Prince von Sachsen-Weimar-Eisenach, who in 2003 dropped his claims for restitution of artwork works, manuscripts and the stock of the Wartburg Fortress close to Eisenach, in return for €15.5 million ($18.2 million).
1/19
The view in direction of Hohenzollern Fortress from Hechingen. Scroll by way of the gallery to see extra from the house of Germany’s would-be royals. Credit score: Patrick Junker/Laif/Redux for CNN
Cultural collateral
In keeping with Prince Georg, the hundreds of things on the road vary from a easy espresso spoon to centuries-old artworks. Objects that ended up exterior Germany or had been in any other case misplaced additionally type a part of the negotiations, in case they finally re-surface. His household can also be in search of money compensation of €1.2 million ($1.four million), which represents the worth of their land on the time it was seized.
In keeping with the Prince’s spokesperson, “It’s secure to imagine that the present worth of the household ́s personal property taken by the communists is a number of hundred occasions increased.” Berlin state authorities in the meantime advised CNN that the general worth of the Hohenzollerns’ declare is “excessive, however not quantifiable.”
There isn’t any longer any property at stake, although the Prince lately settled his declare for the traditional Rheinfels Fortress on the situation that the charity run by his spouse receives a portion of ticket gross sales.
“This debate actually belongs within the public and it can’t, and shouldn’t, be suffocated by authorized motion.”
Eckart Conze, historian
Complicating issues for the German authorities is the truth that Prince Georg can also be the biggest lender of artwork to cultural establishments within the German states of Berlin and Brandenburg (each dealing with authorized claims together with the federal authorities) together with the various work, furnishings and different gadgets on show at Charlottenburg Palace. He owns the crowns of the primary Prussian King and Queen, that are displayed alongside an orb and scepter that he is in search of to have returned. He additionally owns the jewel-encrusted tobacco bins that after belonged to Frederick the Nice, the longest serving Prussian King.
The Prince says he is dedicated to preserving the disputed gadgets on public show, no matter whether or not they finally change arms. “I actually strongly really feel this cultural duty to contribute one thing to the nation and to point out this stuff to the general public,” he says. “Really, we’re on the identical aspect as the federal government.”
He insists his declare shouldn’t be about cash.
“If it was that simple, I believe my ancestors would have bought this place, the Fortress Hohenzollern… and we might have bought our (remaining) artwork assortment, which we lend to Berlin and to Brandenburg” he stated. “It is not so simple as simply taking a examine.”

Georg Friedrich, Prince of Prussia, by a portray of his ancestor Crown Prince Wilhelm. Credit score: Patrick Junker/laif/laif/Patrick Junker/laif
But, he might face an uphill battle convincing a skeptical German public of his charitable motivations. And whereas the case has been quietly ongoing for many years, it has lately turn into a matter of public curiosity, thanks partly to Jan Böhmermann, host of a satirical program akin to “The Day by day Present.”
Within the half-hour section, the late-night comic roasted Prince Georg for having the “balls of metal” to convey his calls for to court docket. The comic additionally dismissed his claims as outrageous and hypocritical, on condition that genocide victims in Germany’s former colonies below the royals’ rule had been by no means compensated.
Excessive-profile clashes
“This debate actually belongs within the public and it can’t, and shouldn’t, be suffocated by authorized motion,” Conze says.
Prince Georg insists that he is by no means sued over crucial reporting, solely false or defamatory statements.
“I believe it is vitally vital to have the liberty of the press, as it’s a part of our structure. And it is also a pillar of our democracy. However mendacity shouldn’t be, and that was the one factor we tried to straighten.”
Requested if he regrets his public dealing with of the case, he says, “We might have been higher on that, sure.”
Negotiating positions
The would-be Kaiser — who can also be 202nd in line to the British throne in accordance with royalty knowledgeable Marlene Koenig — says he hasn’t sought out consideration, however the authorized wrangling has made it unimaginable to keep away from. When he first took over as head of the Home of Hohenzollern at age 18, he initially puzzled if he needed the duty in any respect. However his grandfather requested him to proceed the restitution case, he says, a promise that also motivates him at present.
“I really feel obliged to meet his final will as a result of he additionally wrote very explicitly in his testomony that he expects me to comply with his footsteps,” he stated.
An prolonged interview with Prince Georg
That is, Prince Georg says, a nationwide debate that is but to be resolved.” (Our claims) will not be the explanation for the dialogue… I believe we’re sort of a symptom for the entire dialogue — or the dialogue that should happen,” he says, clearly hoping the historic debate will not distract from Germany’s more moderen authorized traditions: to evaluate a case based mostly on the legislation, not society’s evolving ethical requirements. “I am very joyful that I stay in a constitutional state.”
For now, neither the prince nor the Brandenburg authorities seem prepared to danger an all-or-nothing consequence by taking the case to court docket. Each side lately agreed to delay court docket proceedings, which had been on account of start in August, for one more yr to present them extra time to succeed in a negotiated settlement.
Oscar Holland, Fiona Sinclair Scott, Claudia Otto, Stephanie Halasz, Anastasia Graham-Yooll, Lewis Whyld, Nathan Hodge, Brett Roegiers, Woojin Lee, Hena Sharma, Oscar Featherstone, Ingo Witte, Christian Streib, Martin Bourke and Philip Schneider Klar contributed to this story.

Comments are closed.